Posted: 14 January 2010 at 10:03am | IP Logged

I wish all the scientists and Inteligents to read and give an analytical mind.

The World is getting its heat and all the countries are worried and ask us to save the Forest and plant as many trees as possible so that the Earth is Saved.

Can any one explain the chemistry how the growth of forest is gong to save the Earth.

Sky is 1000 of KMs from the Surface of the earth. How the shadow of the trees going to give the cooling effect and protect us?

I am sure Mr.Kallenwe knows the answer and he will explain the Chemistry of growing the trees and enlarging the forests and how it will protect the Earth.

If he answers then he will accept the above said theory.

Posted: 14 January 2010 at 12:08pm | IP Logged

The balance between animal life and plant life is the goal that is being sought by scientists.  Animals turn organic matter into small, high entropy molecules like CO2, H2O, electromagnetic radiation in the form of heat that is irradiated to space at about 15 deg. C spectral temperature, in other words, the products of combustion that are described by the term mineralization reaction.  Plants take the products of the mineralization reaction and use them as the reactants for photosintesis by the use of high energy electromagnetic radiation from sunlight at a spectral temperature equivalent to about 6,000 degrees absolute (K), to produce low entropy organic matter and oxygen gas.  Imbalance in the rates per unit area of the biosphere between photosinthesis and mineralization is what pollution is all about!  Since after the industrial revolution the rates of mineralization have increased, (because of fuel burning and more animal life per unit area) a similar increase in the rate of photosinthesis is required to mantain balance.  A thermodynamic annalisis in terms of a Carnot engine taking in energy at 6,000deg K and emmiting at 273+15 deg K can actually describe approximatelly the process that is better described in terms of near equilibrium thermodynamics.  This is not BS!

Posted: 14 January 2010 at 2:29pm | IP Logged

Actually this complete and detailed annalisis has been published in a mayor Indian Leather Journal, but I have not yet met anybody whom has claimed to have read it, and certainly none that acknowledge understanding it!  But such is life.

The crux of the thermodynamic environmental annalisis is that the combined photosynthesis/mineralization cycle is part of an sideral entropy pump that allows life to prosper on planet earth. Life produces entropy that needs to be dispossed of, as entropy cannot be destroyed, only created and transferred!  High energy sunlight is the enegy input, whereas low energy "earth-fever" is irradiated out to space.  This energy driven entropy pump, is run then by the temperatures equivalents of the spectral distributions approximated by Boltzman Law decription, by dividing the energy flows by the cube of the temperatures to obtain the entropies flowing and a Carnot Cycle can be set-up to calculate how much entropy per unit biosphere area can be dissipated by this "pump".  The efficiency because of so high temperature differences approaches very high percentages. With high urban population densities when organic products are imported from outlying rural areas, the pumping of entropy per unit area breaks down into the rehealm of irreversible thermodynamics and that is the reason for decentralising entropy producing factories and such centers, such that it is easier for a Natural Cleaning Cycle to take place  (here is only instance where I can "accept" the term natural to have any meaning in polution annalisis!).  The concept of centralizing pollution producing centers such as León, Kolcatta Tannage Center (Old Dhappa), Kampur, The one in Turkey that I do not remember, etc. etc. is absolutelly wrong and creates more instead of less pollution, but has to be understood by the fact that politicians and sannitary engineers willfully do not wan't to believe in thermodynamics, either through ignorance or personal profit. 

Posted: 14 January 2010 at 7:18pm | IP Logged

The area of Earth icluding Sea surface The total volume of the Earth's oceans is: 1.4 × 10⁹ km³. The total surface area of the Earth is 5.1 × 10⁸ km². The area of the Sea may be 66%.

The total area of the forest in Earth may be less than 5%., in which all the trees will not generate the same gas contents in all the areas. For example a tree in North pole will not create Nitrogen, Pottassium. Where as a tree in South India will generate more.

How much of area of the earth can a tree save? What kind of tree is necessary?

Are you sure these trees will generate the gas as scientists expect?

How the scientists are arraiving the figure?

How the scientists are measuring the volume of the gas and separate them?

When the tree can purify the environment of the Earth why can't the rays that generated by burning oil will purify the room?

When the environment is wholly responsible for the ill health why it can not be upgraded?

The environment change in every 100 Kms radious.

Here my point is Earth is getting heat not by burning oils, it is due to continious attck of the rays from the planets. The position of the Planets changes often and the volume of the rays it sends is having more electrons and minerals.

When South India is getting heat in Summer why Russia is reeling in snow?

So, the environment changes in every place and not uniform. So as the type of tree that will suck the power and minerals of earth and lets out the Oxygen and so many gases.

The Oxygen let out by a tree in South India need not be the same in rest of the world.

Instead of finding fault with others' it is the duty of all researchers to apply their mind and see if he gets atleast 1% in his favour.

Most of the people/ researchers who come across many valuable points on their research, forced to omit since it is against his/ her theory. the researchers should have a broad mind and should have the courage to accept the facts, based on which his research paper should be a roll model to others.